Analyzing Teachers’ Assessment Skills in Rural Multigrade Classrooms: A Qualitative Study Based on Lived Experiences

Authors

1 ۵٬۰۰۰ Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Sadoughi Campus kermanshah

2 Farhangian University, Shahid Sadoughi Campus, Kermanshah

3 Professor at Farhangian University, Shahid Sadoughi pardis, Kermanshah

10.48310/istt.2026.21630.1196

Abstract

Background and Objective: Assessment plays a central role in improving learning quality and enhancing instructional effectiveness in multigrade classrooms. In rural schools, teachers face numerous challenges in implementing appropriate assessment procedures due to limited resources, diverse learning needs, and the simultaneous teaching of multiple grade levels. This study aimed to analyze the assessment skills of teachers in rural multigrade classrooms based on their lived professional experiences.
Materials and Methods: This qualitative research was conducted using a case study approach. The participants consisted of nine teachers from rural multigrade classrooms in the villages surrounding Kabudarahang (Mehraban district), selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding.
Findings: Data analysis resulted in 79 open codes, 15 axial categories, and 5 selective themes. The findings revealed that teachers' assessment practices were shaped around five core skill areas: designing adaptable assessment tools (e.g., multilevel tests, portfolio-based assessment, integrative tasks), managing individual differences among students, managing limited instructional time, applying participatory assessment techniques (self-assessment and peer assessment), and adapting assessment strategies to environmental constraints such as resource shortages and lack of instructional materials.
Conclusion: The study highlights that effective assessment in multigrade classrooms requires flexible, context-responsive, and experience-based professional skills. Strengthening teachers’ assessment competencies, addressing existing challenges, and utilizing diverse and low-cost assessment tools can significantly enhance the quality of learning in rural multigrade classrooms. It is recommended that teacher training programs pay greater attention to assessment literacy specifically tailored to the needs of rural and multigrade schools.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Entehai-Arani, S., Rezaei, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2021). Challenges of implementing formative assessment in primary education: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Research in Primary Education, 10(2), 45–62.
Farajollahi, M., & Haghighi, A. (2007). Qualitative–descriptive assessment and its role in improving primary school students’ learning. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 23–41. (In Persian)
Rahimi, M., Hosseini, S., & Karimi, N. (2022). Investigating teaching and classroom management challenges in rural multi-grade classrooms. Journal of Education and Assessment
14(3), 89–110.
Taghipour, A., & Mazharpour, F. (2025). ‌ational barriers to formative assessment in Iranian primary schools. Journal of Educational Innovations, 24(1), 71–92.
Namdari, M., & Khosronezhari, R. (2024). Teachers’ experiences of teaching in multi-grade classrooms: A qualitative study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 133–154.
Mohammadvand, S. (2024). Professional challenges of multi-grade classroom teachers in rural schools. Journal of Rural Education, 6(2), 55–74.
Farajollahi, M., & Haghighi, A. (2007). Qualitative–descriptive assessment and its role in improving learning in primary education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 23–41.
Mahmoudi, A., Zarei, F., & Karimi, L. (2016). Investigating the outcomes of implementing descriptive assessment in primary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 101–120.
Berry, C. (2013). Multi-grade teaching: A discussion document. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Hargreaves, E., Montero, C., Chau, N., Sibli, M., & Thanh, T. (2023). Teaching and learning in multi-grade classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, 102117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102117
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2020). The impact of judgement practices on assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1766428
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
OECD. (2023). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/0f8f55f7-en
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
Shepard, L. A. (2020). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183–200.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220902869
UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2023). Transforming education: Guidelines for assessment in diverse learning contexts. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Elia, I., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). Effects of formative assessment on student learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09332-8
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 November 2025
  • Revise Date: 18 January 2026
  • Accept Date: 27 January 2026
  • First Publish Date: 27 January 2026
  • Publish Date: 22 November 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics