Exploring the Lived Experiences of Candidates in the Supplementary Evaluation Process of Farhangian University with an Emphasis on Preparation Resources, Perceptions, and Learning Outcomes: A Qualitative Study

Authors

Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

10.48310/istt.2026.22423.1214

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The design of a professional competency assessment system for teacher selection at Farhangian University is a necessity emphasized in strategic documents. Despite the focus on technical indicators, the lived experiences of applicants regarding this process have been less studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the lived experiences of applicants regarding the complementary assessment process at Farhangian University and to understand their perceptions of its various dimensions. Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative approach and an interpretative phenomenological method. The research field included all applicants participating in the supplementary evaluation stage at Fatemeh al-Zahra (S) Campus in Tabriz during the 2023–2024 academic year. Among them, 31 participants were selected using purposive (criterion) sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis based on Braun and Clarke's six-step model. To ensure validity and reliability, peer review, member checking, and inter-coder agreement methods were employed. Findings: Data analysis led to the identification of 5 main themes and 15 sub-themes. The main themes were: "Preparation resources and pre-interview strategies", "Perceptions of the environmental and organizational context", "Cognitive-emotional experience of the assessment process", "Learning outcomes and self-awareness", and "Suggestions for process improvement". The results showed that applicants consider the supportive environment and friendly behavior of evaluators as key factors in reducing their anxiety, while emphasizing the need to improve technical infrastructure and optimize scheduling. Conclusion: The findings indicated that complementary assessment, beyond being a screening tool, acts as an initial stage in the process of socialization and the formation of teachers' professional identity. This process plays an educational and developmental role by enhancing applicants' self-awareness and communication skills. Therefore, viewing this process as a professional development cycle (rather than just a selection filter) can help improve the quality of future teacher recruitment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2004). Managing human resources (13 ed). South Western, Thomson,
Corporation.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in
psychology, 14, 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .
Cheng, A., & Hitt, C. (2020). The power of teacher selection to improve education. Brookings
Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-power-of-teacherselection-to-improve-education/
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn? European
Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (3), 291–309.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315391 .
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Gitomer, D. H. (2007). Teacher quality in a changing policy landscape: Improvements in the
teacher pool. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Gitomer, D. H., & Qi, Y. (2010). From selection to assessment: Aligning teacher preparation and
teacher evaluation. Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ936743.pdf
Goldhaber, D., Gratz, T., & Theobald, R. (2017). What’s in a teacher test? Assessing the
relationship between teacher licensure test scores and student achievement. Economics of
Education Review, 61, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.006
Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Routledge .
Hammond, D. (2006). Teachers and teaching: Signs of a changing profession, handbook of
reseach on teacher education. Newyork: Macmillan .
Kim, L. E., Bardach, L., & Klassen, R. (2021). Teacher selection and recruitment. In Oxford
Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1118
Klassen, R. M., & Kim, L. E. (2019). Selecting teachers: A meta-analysis. Educational Research
Review, 26, 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.002
Klassen, R. M., Kim, L. E., Rushby, J. V., & Bardach, L. (2020). Can we predict teacher
candidates’ future effectiveness? Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1–27.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09489-3 .
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework
for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
OECD. (2020). A framework for teacher competencies. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Raths, J., & Lyman, F. (2003). Summative evaluation of student teachers: An enduring problem.
Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 206-216.
Rockoff, J., Jacob, B., Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2011). Can teacher selection help improve
teaching? Education Finance and Policy, 6 (2), 167–208.
https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00030
Rutledge, S. A., Harris, D. N., & Ingle, W. K. (2020). How principals and districts can improve
teacher selection. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(123).
https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5082
Sahlberg, P. (2010). Selecting the qualified: A standards-based teacher education admission
process. Research in Comparative and International Education, 5(2), 176–184.
https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2010.5.2.176
Sautelle, E., Bowles, T., Hattie, J., & Arifin, D. N. (2015). Personality, resilience, self- regulation
and cognitive ability relevant to teacher selection. Australian Journal of Teacher
Education, 40(4), 53-71. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.4 .
Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform.
OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252059-en.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory,
method and research. London: Sage Publications.
Somech, A. and Oplatka, I. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools: Examining 
the impact and opportunities within educational systems, (Vol. 623). Routledge.
Stronge, J. (2002). Qualities of effective teacher. Association for supervision and curriculum
development, Alexandria, N.A.
Tsukada, M. (2008). Institutionanlized supplementary education in Japan: the Yobiko and ronin
student adaptations. Comparative Education, 24(3), 285-303 
  • Receive Date: 05 April 2026
  • Revise Date: 07 May 2026
  • Accept Date: 05 June 2026
  • First Publish Date: 05 June 2026
  • Publish Date: 22 May 2026