The Lived Experience of Arabic Language Teachers in Creating Dialogic Spaces

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665–889, Tehran, Iran

10.48310/jte.2026.22443.1215

Abstract

Despite the growing emphasis on meaning-oriented and communicative approaches, Arabic language classrooms in universities and schools often remain shaped by rigid, text-centered, and non-dialogic instructional frameworks. These traditional methods undermine teachers’ professional identities and restrict students’ opportunities to experience authentic presence, participation, and meaning-making. This study phenomenologically explored Arabic language teachers’ lived experiences of creating dialogic spaces and examined the possibility of implementing existential education at Farhangian University and in public schools.

Using a qualitative approach grounded in philosophical hermeneutics and interpretive phenomenology, the study investigated the meaning of this phenomenon from teachers’ perspectives. Participants included seven Arabic language instructors at Farhangian University and five schoolteachers who held doctoral degrees and had university-level teaching experience. Their teaching experience ranged from five to thirty years. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), following the approach developed by Smith and colleagues.

The analysis identified five overarching themes: the tension between rigid educational structures and the desire for dialogue; the reconceptualization of the teacher’s role as an existential co-traveler; the transformation of the teacher–student relationship from mere knowledge transmission toward shared understanding; the emergence of the classroom as a space for unfolding existential possibilities; and liberation from textual dominance through the revitalization of language as living discourse.

The findings indicate that dialogic spaces are not merely pedagogical techniques or instructional strategies but embody a particular way of being in the classroom. They create conditions for students’ voices to be heard, teachers’ identities to develop, and shared meaning to emerge. Drawing on existential education associated with Heidegger and Bakhtin, the study concludes that existential education is possible in Arabic classrooms, provided that the dialogic relationship among the teacher, student, and text is fundamentally reconfigured.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abbasi, F., Hejazi, E., & Hakimzadeh, R. (2020). Lived experience of
    elementary school teachers regarding opportunities and challenges of teaching in
    the Student Educational Network (SHAD): A phenomenological study.
    Teaching Research, 8(3), 1–24. [In Persian]
    2. Arab, A., Jabbari Badri, A., & Salari, S. (2024). The role of job performance in
    predicting teacher productivity: Comparing young teachers with working retired
    teachers in elementary schools. Teacher Experiences, 3(3), 13–35.
    https://doi.org/10.48310/stt.2024.17181.1099 [In Persian]
    3. Bakhtin, M. (2008). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (R. Pourazar,
    Trans.). Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
  2. 4. Beh Raqam, N. (2021). Challenges of Arabic syntax teaching methods in
    universities. Journal of Research in Arabic Language and Literature Education,
    3(3). [In Persian]
    5. Benveydi, M. (2025). Investigating the effect of Arabic language instruction
    with a communicative approach on students’ attitudes toward the Arabic course.
    1st International Conference on Emerging Research in Psychology and
    Educational Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/2525838 [In Persian]
    6. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall,
    Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). Continuum.
    7. Hassani, M. H., & Ashouri, H. (2024). A qualitative study of the consequences
    of the responsive curriculum in higher education (Case study: Field of
    educational sciences). Journal of Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 5(17),
    113–152. [In Persian]
    8. Heidegger, M. (2016). Being and time (A. Rashidian, Trans.). Ney Publishing.
    [In Persian]
    9. Nemati, S., Karimian, P., & Abdizadeh, M. (2019). Phenomenology of bilingual
    primary teachers’ lived experiences in teaching Persian language. 3rd National
    Conference on Psychology, Education, and Lifestyle, Qazvin, Iran.
    https://civilica.com/doc/1020752 [In Persian]
    10. Noghrehei, M. (2025). Political theology of education: A research agenda for
    education in Iran. Journal of Foundations of Education, 15(1). [In Persian]
    11. Qoreh-Jili, S. (2025). Elementary teachers’ lived experience of playfulness in
    the teaching process: A phenomenological study. Theory and Practice in
    Teacher Education, 11(20), 273–292.
    https://doi.org/10.48310/ITT.2025.21335.1226 [In Persian]
    12. Ranjbar, M. H., & Arghavani Bidokhti, H. (2025). Analyzing the effect of
    Arabic syntactic structures along with motivation on Arabic language learning
    process. Journal of Research in Arabic Language and Literature Education (In
    press). [In Persian]
    13. Salehi, K., & Shafaei, R. (2017). Representation of teachers’ lived experiences
    of elementary students’ learning difficulties: A phenomenological study. Journal
    of Psychological Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.22059/JAPR.2015.66722
    [In Persian]
    14. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological
    analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.
    15. Tavakoli, Y., Rahmani, H., Tavakoli, R., & Tavakoli, A. (2021). Designing and
    explaining the role of the teacher in motivating students’ academic achievement:
    A qualitative research using narrative inquiry method. Journal of Internship
    Studies in Teacher Education, 1(4). [In Persian]
    16. Van Manen, M. (2024). Researching lived experience: Human science for an
    action sensitive pedagogy (M. T. Roudi, Trans.). Siahrood Publications. [In Persian]
  • Receive Date: 24 February 2026
  • Revise Date: 16 October 2026
  • Accept Date: 16 October 2026
  • First Publish Date: 16 October 2026
  • Publish Date: 23 August 2026