The Role of Knowledge Management in Enhancing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Elementary Science Teachers: Challenges and Perspectives with a Systematic Review Approach

Authors

1 Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Biology Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

10.48310/jte.2026.24340.1292

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Teaching experimental sciences at the elementary level is one of the most sensitive and challenging domains of any educational system, as the foundations of scientific thinking are formed during this period. The concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is recognized as the central core of teaching expertise that distinguishes the teacher from a mere subject-matter specialist. Over time, this knowledge has been conceptualized at three levels: collective knowledge, personal knowledge, and enacted knowledge. Today, the effective implementation of knowledge management in schools faces serious challenges. Khodarahmi et al. (2024) demonstrated that the academic aspect of PCK is shared and teachable knowledge, whereas its classroom aspect is personal and context-dependent knowledge formed through teaching experience, reflection, and interaction with students. International research has shown that implementing knowledge management in schools faces obstacles such as time constraints, weak collaboration and trust culture, and limited digital skills (Hipolito-Martinez, 2025). In the Iranian educational system, these challenges are exacerbated by structural issues such as centralization, the absence of an efficient knowledge-sharing system, and teachers' limited access to authoritative scientific resources. Despite the abundance of research conducted in the domain of PCK in Iran, the majority of these studies have addressed the concept, components, or methods of developing this knowledge (Khakbaz, 2015; Pourbaghban et al., 2022; Nemati et al., 2022; Khodarahmi et al., 2024). What has remained neglected is the examination of the role of knowledge management as a systematic approach in facilitating elementary science teachers' access to PCK and transforming collective knowledge into personal and enacted knowledge. Therefore, the present study, employing a systematic review approach and thematic analysis, seeks to answer the fundamental question: What is the role of knowledge management in enhancing PCK of elementary science teachers, and what challenges and perspectives accompany this process?

Methods: The present study employed a systematic review approach, following the PRISMA 2020 statement (Page et al., 2021). This approach, by emphasizing transparency, reproducibility, and the reduction of research biases, enables the attainment of a comprehensive and reliable synthesis of findings from previous research (Li & Robinson, 2022). The implementation process comprised six key stages: (1) formulating the research question based on the PICOS model and determining inclusion and exclusion criteria; (2) systematic searching in authoritative Persian and English databases using combinations of specialized keywords and Boolean operators; (3) screening articles at three levels (identification, initial screening based on title and abstract, and eligibility assessment based on full text) and documenting reasons for exclusion; (4) assessing the methodological quality of selected articles using the CASP checklist and calculating the inter-coder agreement coefficient; (5) extracting key data from the final articles using a standardized data extraction form; and (6) analyzing and synthesizing the extracted data using thematic network analysis based on Attride-Stirling's three-level model (comprising basic themes, organizing themes, and global themes) (Attride-Stirling, 2001). This analytical process led to the identification and categorization of findings into three main global themes: "The Roles of Knowledge Management in Enhancing PCK," "Challenges Facing the Implementation of Knowledge Management," and "Future Perspectives."

Findings: The analysis of the extracted data from 14 final articles using thematic network analysis led to the identification of three global themes: "The Roles of Knowledge Management in Enhancing PCK," "Challenges Facing the Implementation of Knowledge Management," and "Future Perspectives." The findings revealed that knowledge management contributes to PCK enhancement through three main pathways. First, facilitating access to collective knowledge, which includes access to authoritative resources, documentation of experiences, and the creation of teacher knowledge bases. The analysis of the studies revealed that, despite the high potential of knowledge management, its implementation in schools faces three categories of fundamental challenges. First, cultural challenges include weak trust, individualistic culture, and resistance to change. The second category is structural challenges, which include time constraints, high workload, and multiple work pressures. Cooper et al. (2022) demonstrated that teachers complain about the lack of time for personal study, and Khodarahmi et al. (2024) pointed to the lack of time and the high volume of curriculum as obstacles to PCK development. The third category is technological challenges, including weak digital skills and inadequate infrastructure. Hipolito-Martinez (2025) considered knowledge management and digital skills as two complementary factors, and Nilsson (2022) noted that student-teachers' technological experiences depend heavily on school equipment. The third perspective is the use of modern technologies in knowledge sharing, including artificial intelligence, recommender systems, and online collaboration platforms. Wong et al. (2022) demonstrated that online professional development programs based on learning experience design increase teachers' knowledge and confidence. The desirable perspective is movement toward the intelligent and integrated use of modern technologies alongside participatory and research-oriented approaches, so as to pave the way for sustainable PCK development among science teachers.

Discussion and Conclusion: The results indicate that knowledge management can serve as a bridge between collective and personal knowledge, reducing the theory-practice gap in science education. Nevertheless, achieving this requires a multifaceted and coordinated approach that simultaneously addresses technological infrastructure development, cultural transformation, teacher empowerment, and organizational restructuring. It is necessary to provide a clear conceptual distinction among the three main constructs of this research: knowledge management refers to the systematic processes of creating, storing, sharing, and applying knowledge and functions as an organizational infrastructure; PCK is the core of teaching expertise, comprising a combination of content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge; and TPACK is the developed form of PCK in the technological context. Therefore, knowledge management is considered as the tool and platform, PCK as the ultimate goal, and TPACK as a specific domain of PCK. Based on the findings, practical recommendations include: developing knowledge bases and documenting experiences; institutionalizing professional learning communities; technological empowerment and culturalization; revising teacher education curricula; and intelligent application of technology. Research recommendations include: designing an indigenous model; conducting experimental and intervention studies; in-depth exploration of obstacles; examining the role of emerging technologies; and comparative studies.

Keywords: Knowledge Management, Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Elementary Science Teachers, Systematic Review, Thematic Analysis, Professional Development

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aftabi, P., Ali Asgari, M., & Ghadri, M. (2019). Designing the knowledge model of first-grade
secondary school science teachers in Kurdistan province: Based on grounded theory. Journal of
Teaching Research, 7(2), 161-188. [In Persian]
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative
Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Buldu, E. & Buldu, M. (2021). Investigating pre-service early childhood teachers’ cPCK and pPCK
on the knowledge used in the scientific process through CoRe. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211025564
Burden, K., Younie, S. & Leask, M. (2013). Translational research principles applied to education:
The Mapping Educational Specialist Knowhow (MESH) initiative. Journal of Education for
Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 39(4), 459-463.
Carlson, J., Daehler, K., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A.,... & Wilson, C. D.
(2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In
Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp.
77-94). Springer.
Chaharbashloo, H., Ali Asgari, M. Gholami, Kh. & Mousapour, N. (2018). Identifying the content
and source of practical knowledge of experienced elementary teachers: Its implications for
elementary teacher education in the teacher education system. Journal of Curriculum Studies,
8(16), 1-27. [In Persian]
Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, A., & Carpendale, J. (2022). A reading group for science educators: An
approach for developing personal and collective pedagogical content knowledge in science
education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(Suppl 1), 117–139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10260-y
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2024). CASP qualitative studies checklist. https://caspuk.net/casp-tools-checklists/qualitative-studies-checklist/
Hipolito-Martinez, F. T. (2025). Knowledge management and digital skills in secondary school
teachers: A systematic review. Episteme Koinonía, 8(esp2), 75-91.
https://doi.org/10.35381/e.k.v8i2.4855
Khakbaz, A. S. (2015). How to develop pedagogical content knowledge for teaching university
mathematics. Biannual Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 6(12), 71-98. [In
Persian]
Khodarahmi, M., Ghadri, M., Khosravi, M., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2024). Explaining the
conceptual model of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development for novice teachers.
Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(73), 93-142. [In Persian]
Khosravi, R. A. & Ghasemi, N. (2024). The role of teacher-centered research in developing
pedagogical content knowledge for chemistry teachers. Journal of Research in Chemistry
Education, 6(3), 16-31. [In Persian]
Lee, E., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2025). The impact of collective PCK learning on elementary teachers'
personal PCK. Teaching and Teacher Education.
Lee, K. Y., Kim, S., & Park, H. (2024). Exploring the changes in elementary teachers' modeling
PCK through knowledge exchange of the refined consensus model. Journal of the Korean
Association for Research in Science Education, 44(1), 105-118.
Li, T. Saldanha, I. J., & Robinson, K. A. (2022). Introduction to systematic reviews. In Principles
and Practice of Clinical Trials (pp. 2159–2177). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52636-2_194
Lieberei, T., Welter, V. D. E., & Krell, M. (2026). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about
scientific reasoning in different groups of science teachers and its relation to other variables.
International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2026.2684245
Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019). Strengthening the research base that
informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 41(3), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719849044
Maeng, S. (2024). Understanding the three realms of PCK in the Refined Consensus Model.
Research in Science Education.
Mahdavi, N., Niknam, Z., Attaran, M., & Mousapour, N. (2023). Exploring the professional actions
of elementary education educators at Farhangian University regarding pedagogical content
knowledge. Biannual Journal of Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 11(21), 321-354. [In
Persian]
Mahdavi, N., Niknam, Z., Attaran, M., Mousapour, N., & Azimi, M. (2024). The evolution of
pedagogical content knowledge from the beginning until now: The history of an idea. Biannual
Journal of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, 10(17), 14-34. [In Persian]
Nemati, T., Kian, J., & Yari Haj Ataloo, J. (2022). Synthesis of pedagogical content knowledge
(PCK) components of science teachers: Presenting a conceptual model. Journal of Research in
Curriculum Planning, 19(45), 92-109. [In Persian]
Nilsson, P. (2022). From PCK to TPACK: Supporting student teachers’ reflections and use of
digital technologies in science teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(3),
553–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2131759
Ning, Y., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T. T., & Chen, J. (2022). Teacher education interventions on teacher
TPACK: A meta-analysis study. Sustainability, 14(18), 11791.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811791
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... &
Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pourbaghban, S., Mahmoudi, F., Fathi Azar, I., & Kohestani, B. (2020). Virtual reality curriculum
model in science lesson. Journal of Theory and Practice in the Curriculum, 16(8). [In Persian]
Ramezani, A., Sharifi, M., Nasr, S., & Moghaddami, P. (2024). Developing teachers' professional
knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Journal of Educational 
Innovations, 23(90), 57-82. [In Persian]
Ranjdoost, Sh., Khezri Danjeh, Z., & Baradari, N. (2024). Investigating the differences in
educational expectations of sixth-grade students from teachers, parents, and classmates
regarding e-learning curriculum content. Journal of Health and Education in Early Childhood,
5(2), 15-25. [In Persian]
Romero-Ochoa, J. A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2025). Knowledge
management as a bridge between collective and personal knowledge in teacher education.
Educational Research Review.
Roth, K. J., Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., & Hvidsten, C. (2018). Comparing the
effects of analysis-of-practice and content-based professional development on teacher and
student outcomes in science. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1217–1253.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218814759
Salehi, M., Kian, J., Yari Haj Ataloo, J., & Nemati, T. (2021). Teachers' knowledge and pedagogical
competencies. Journal of Research in Curriculum Planning, 18(44), 46-60. [In Persian]
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard
Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Smith, P. S., Esch, R. K., & Plumley, C. L. (2023). The gap between collective and personal PCK in
elementary science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
Stender, A., & Brückmann, M. (2020). Processes of knowledge integration between realms of
pedagogical content knowledge and how to capture them. In International Perspectives on
Knowledge Integration (pp. 105-125). Brill.
https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004429499/BP000014.xml
Tseng, K. H., Luo, S. C., Chen, Y., Yang, H. J., & Hsu, W. H. (2008). Utilizing a knowledge
management platform in promoting applied science teachers' professional growth. Chinese
Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 53-74.
Wiig, K. M. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 6(3), 224-239.
Wong, J. T., Bui, N. N., Fields, D. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2022). A learning experience design
approach to online professional development for teaching science through the arts: Evaluation
of teacher content knowledge, self-efficacy, and STEAM perceptions. Journal of Science
Teacher Education, 34(4), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2112552
  • Receive Date: 01 September 2026
  • Revise Date: 15 October 2026
  • Accept Date: 20 October 2026
  • First Publish Date: 20 October 2026
  • Publish Date: 23 August 2026